Language:
    • Available Formats
    • Options
    • Availability
    • Priced From ( in USD )
    • Secure PDF 🔒
    • 👥
    • Immediate download
    • $24.00
    • Add to Cart
    • Printed Edition
    • Ships in 1-2 business days
    • $24.00
    • Add to Cart

Customers Who Bought This Also Bought

 

About This Item

 

Full Description

Nonpoint sources of fecal contamination are a significant detriment to water quality and impose risks to aquatic ecosystems and human health. Over the past four decades, the swine industry has become an increasing environmental concern worldwide, due to augmented production and concentration of farming operations. Despite attempts to reduce fecal loading into aquatic environments, the problem endures, in part as a result of the inability to routinely identify the origin of fecal pollution. This study evaluated the specificity, distribution, and sensitivity of available pig-specific assays targeting the Bacteroidales 16S rRNA gene and the methanogen mcrA gene. The assays were tested against DNA extracts derived from 88 pig fecal samples (OH, DE, TX, and WV), 98 non-target mammalian fecal samples (NE, WV, TX), and 47 groundwater and surface water samples (IL). The study also investigated the phylogenetic diversity of 1200 Bacteroidales 16S rRNA gene sequences derived from swine feces, lagoons, manure pits, and waters adjacent to swine operations. PCR results indicated that 95.5% and 87.5% of swine fecal DNA extracts were positive with the general and pig-specific Bacteroidales assay, respectively. However, the pig-specific Bacteroidales PCR assay was also positive for sheep (i.e. 2 of 8) and horse (i.e. 4 of 12) fecal DNA, suggesting potential issues with host-specificity. The mcrA gene marker was detected in less than one-third of all swine fecal samples, indicating lower detection limits when compared to the Bacteroidales assay. Only 17% of the water samples tested with the pig-specific Bacteroidales yielded positive PCR results. Phylogenetic analysis of swine fecal clones revealed that approximately 40% of the sequences were shared by previously identified Bacteroidales clones derived from mammals other than swine. In contrast, 23 pig fecal clones closely related to Prevotella populations showed pig-specific distributions. While Bacteroidales populations may be promising targets for swine fecal source tracking, further sequencing analysis of environmental clones is needed to better discriminate pig-fecal specific populations in contaminated watersheds from other potential fecal pollution sources. Includes abstract only.